A lot to unpack here - I do fittings everyday and communication is key. First in regards with the loft differences - yes there is a distance advantage with the stronger lofts, but in my experience especially in the T200 line, is I am willing to bet you also hit the the T200's higher than your your higher lofted mp32's. There is a lot of technology in the multimaterial iron sets that lower the cg that to optimize trajectory you have to strengthen the loft - dual distance benefit. Secondly, with your lie angle - assuming you had std lie on your mp32's going 2* up on titleist will be about a 3.5* difference than what you are used to (miz tends to be flatter, titleist is set more upright at their std.) I always look at ball flight first, tendencies second and inherent swing flaws that can create a false reading 3rd (a hard over the top or out to in swing path will tend to get very toe heavy results, but going more upright won't change or help) lastly to confirm my findings i use a static measurement to verify or lean towards one direction if we are borderline. There should be constant communication through this process. If I am wrong about the T200's flying higher that may be more to the cleaner "pick" or thin shot with the mp32's which will increase spin and trajectory - false read, but if you pick normally then the extra tungsten and low cg in the t200's will produce a better trajectory by flattening out your ball flight. If you feel the fitting wasn't right you can always have a certified fitter check your specs and if needed you can have the lie angles adjusted by titleist or your local shop that has a qualified repair specialist- hope this helps.

Helps a lot! Thanks for the detailed response. I’m a 9 handicap so I feel my swing is pretty good. So I don’t think my swing had anything to do with changing my lie angle. I’ll chalk it up to a bad fitting.